Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Permanent Work of Public Art That Was Taken Down

Manufactures and Features

Controversial Public Art. Debate, Fury, Vandalism and Loss.

controversial public art - Anish Kapoor's Dirty Corner
Covering anti-Semitic vandalism on Anish Kapoor'due south Muddied Corner with gold leaf

Past: Tori Campbell

Controversial Public Art

When controversial art stands behind the closed doors of museums and galleries, it gains the attending of only its near outspoken critics. All the same, when the art is displayed in the public realm of civic or communal spaces, mingling in the everyday lives of people, occasionally paid for with the taxpayer's dollar — the artworks tin can exist subject to much more controversy and ire. The large-scale installations explored here are some of the most controversial public art pieces in history; some removed by court-lodge, many vandalised by sledgehammers or graffiti — and a few that still stand up today, ready for a new batch of outrage and debate. Read on to see which side you lot stand up with: that of the critics, or the artists?

Richard Serra: Tilted Arc

Tilted Arc (1981) by Richard Serra
Richard Serra, Tilted Arc, Steel, 365.7 10 3657.6 10 30.45 cm, Destroyed,, 1981.

In 1979 the Usa General Services Administration'due south Art-in-Architecture plan decided to commission a large-scale piece of public art for the plaza in forepart of a planned addition to the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building in New York Urban center. Upon the communication of a panel of fine art experts, Richard Serra, a minimalist sculptor of considerable acclamation, was called. With an exemplary piece of mail service-minimalist work, Serra installed Tilted Arc in 1981, and it rapidly became one of the about controversial public fine art pieces of all time. The solid unfinished plate of steel, spanning 120 anxiety in length and 12 feet in pinnacle, bisected the Federal Plaza, intentionally necessitating new paths for those who frequented the building as Serra explained ""The viewer becomes aware of himself and of his motility through the plaza. As he moves, the sculpture changes. Contraction and expansion of the sculpture result from the viewer's motion. Step by step, the perception not but of the sculpture but of the entire environment changes." The piece inspired immediate backlash due to its physical imposition on the government workers, and within mere months over 1300 employees had signed a petition for its removal. Arguing that the slice in its very nature was site specific, and having it relocated would destroy the piece of work entirely, Serra had the back up of influential members of the artistic customs in a 1985 hearing about Tilted Arc'south removal — including Andy Warhol, Claes Oldenburg, and Phillip Glass. Despite this support, a jury ultimately voted 4-ane to have the sculpture removed; and due to Serra's insistence that the work never be exhibited once again, it remains in government storage to this twenty-four hour period.

Richard Serra, Tilted Arc, 1981
Richard Serra, Tilted Arc, Steel, 365.7 x 3657.6 ten 30.45 cm, Destroyed, Photo: Anne Chauvet,  1981.
Courtesy Richard Serra

Keith Haring: Crack is Wack

Keith Haring Crack is Wack  controversial public art
Keith Haring, Crack is Wack, Eastward 128 Street & second Avenue, concrete handball wall, paint, 1986.

At a time when United States President Ronald Reagan was declaring his infamous 'State of war on Drugs' while his wife Nancy Reagan encouraged people to 'Just Say No' one would expect Keith Haring's public art Fissure is Wack landscape to be a welcome addition to the scenery of a drive south down the Harlem River Drive and not a controversial public art piece. While installed simultaneously to move local children towards drug-awareness, Haring's unauthorized slice also unfortunately happened to coincide with New York City Mayor Ed Koch's crackdown on graffiti. Putting the city firmly between a rock and a hard place with his Crevice is Wack slice on the side of a handball court, Haring was enjoying a smash in his own career — being hassled past police force while making his art (literally) underground in the subway, he was as well selling the same works in galleries for thousands of dollars. Thus, the Parks Section fined Haring $100 dollars, something that the city would after apologise for, while request him to recreate the slice as a permanent installation. You can run across the work for yourself in New York Urban center at East 128 Street and 2nd Artery on both sides of a physical handball wall.

David Hammons: How Ya Like Me Now?

David Hammons: How Ya Like Me Now?
David Hammons,How Ya Like Me Now?, Photograph by Tim Nighswander/Imaging4Art.com. 1988.
© David Hammons. Courtesy of Glenstone Museum, Potomac, Maryland.

Conceived as part of a Washington Project for the Arts exhibition entitled The Blues Aesthetic: Blackness Culture and Modernism David Hammons' How Ya Similar Me Now beginning appeared on a tin can billboard on a street corner across from the National Portrait Gallery in Washington D.C. with no designation. Depicting Black civil rights leader Reverend Jesse Jackson with blonde pilus, blueish eyes, and white skin; with the lyrics from iconic eighties Rap artist Kool Moe Dee — How Ya Like Me Now — irreverently scrawled forth the lesser. Though the huge xiv×sixteen foot billboard was intended to provoke past displaying the whitewashed blackness leader adjacent to rap lyrics; providing a juxtaposition that showed how pop culture was co-opting and commodifying black identity; local youths saw the piece of work as racist and destroyed with sledgehammers. The piece has since been reinstalled within gallery walls, aslope a row of sledgehammers — ultimately incorporating the vandalism into the final work.

Guerrilla Girls: Do Women Take To Be Naked To Get Into the Met. Museum?

Do Women Have To Be Naked To Get Into the Met. Museum?
Guerrilla Girls, Do Women Have To Be Naked To Become Into the Met. Museum?, diverse dimensions, Screenprint on paper, 1989.

When asked to design a billboard for the Public Fine art Fund in New York City the fine art-activist political feminist group the Guerrilla Girls found the perfect opportunity to critique the inherent sexism in museum collections and exhibitions. Inspired by the 1984 exhibition International Survey of Painting and Sculpture at the Museum of Modern Art that included the work of 169 artists, less than 10% of whom were women; the group gear up out to brand a statement. Natural language-in-cheek but serious nonetheless, they conducted a self-entitled 'weenie count' at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, where they compared the number of nude males to nude females on display; while also noting the dismal lack of representation of the piece of work of female artists. Using the imagery from the 1814 Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres painting the Grande Odalisque the Guerrilla Girls took the bailiwick from the painting and put their personalised twist on it — bedecking the concubine with a gorilla mask, as the artist grouping themselves were known for, and splattering "Do Women Have to be Naked to get into the Met. Museum? Less than 5% of the artists in the Modern Fine art Sections are women, only 85% of the nudes are female" across the controversial public fine art poster. Despite appropriating an oft-used image for the work the Public Fine art Fund rejected the piece. Even so, the Guerrilla Girls then rented advertising space on New York Metropolis buses, until the Metropolitan Transport Authority cancelled their lease, explaining that the image "was too suggestive and that the effigy appeared to have more than a fan in her hand."

Pierre Vivant: Traffic Light Tree

Traffic Light Tree by Pierre Vivant
Pierre Vivant, Traffic Light Tree, 8 meters, 75 sets of reckoner-controlled traffic lights, 1998.

Originally installed at the junctions of Westferry Road, Heron Quay Bank, and Marsh Wall in Limehouse; French sculptor Pierre Vivant's Traffic Calorie-free Tree can now be found in Poplar, London. The controversial public art piece came to be after a contest run by the Public Art Commissions Agency for the London Docklands Development Corporation under their public art programme. Replacing a aeroplane tree dying of pollution, the Traffic Lite Tree is comprised of 75 sets of traffic lights and stands at a towering eight meters. Each calorie-free, controlled by a reckoner, was originally intended to be linked to the hustle of the London Stock Commutation — only when that concept turned out to be as well plush, the lights were calibrated to reflect the never-ending rhythm of the commercial, fiscal, and domestic activities in London's Canary Wharf. Understandably, the Traffic Light Tree turned out to be uncommonly confusing to unsuspecting motorists trying to navigate the roundabout — leading some drivers to even take the roundabout the wrong style around! Ultimately though, the aesthetics of the slice won over the general public, and though tourists may at times exist defenseless unawares by Vivant'due south work, locals have cited it as 1 of the visually most pleasing roundabouts in the state.

Lei Yixin: Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial

controversial public art Lei Yixin's Stone of Hope
Lei Yixin, Stone of Promise, White granite, 30 ft (9.i 1000), 2011.

A rousing controversy from start to finish the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial was bailiwick to dispute fifty-fifty before its structure started. Firstly, Lei Yixin, a Chinese sculptor who was neither Black nor American, was called to realise the soaring sculptural depiction of the memorial'southward subject. Yixin was a particularly controversial choice as, human rights activists pointed out, he had previously sculpted the Chinese communist revolutionary who became the founding male parent of the People's Commonwealth of China, Mao Zedong. Yixin so chose Chinese granite for the sculpture in defiance of many, most notably African-American artist Gilbert Young'south demands that the memorial be created past an African-American artist with American rock. The sculpture, crafted past reportedly non-matrimony and uncompensated workers, when unveiled, revealed a botched paraphrased quote of Rex's reading "I was a pulsate major for justice, peace, and righteousness." when the original quote rang of greater humility and depth as, "If you lot desire to say that I was a pulsate major, say that I was a drum major for justice. Say that I was a drum major for peace. I was a drum major for righteousness. And all of the other shallow things will not matter." The backlash around the quote led to a near one thousand thousand dollar effort to remove information technology just a year later — the piece now stands with abstract striations where the quote once lay.

Paul McCarthy: Tree

Paul McCarthy Tree
Paul McCarthy, Tree, 24m, Destroyed/removed, 2014.

Installed at the Place Vendôme in Paris in Oct 2014 as part of the FIAC's (International Fair of Contemporary Art) Hors les Murs exhibition, Paul McCarthy's Tree lasted just two days before vandalism brought the piece downward. The 24-meter high inflatable sculpture purporting to exist a green Christmas tree also bore a hitting resemblance to a sex activity toy, a butt-plug to exist exact, and the sculptor himself has since admitted that he deliberately shaped his slice this way as a joke. Even so, not all viewers found the work as funny as McCarthy, and less than 48 hours later on its installation a vandal climbed the fencing around the sculpture and cutting the power supply that kept the slice inflated, also equally the structural support cords. McCarthy did not desire the work repaired or replaced but he exhibited Tree over again in 2016 at Paramount Ranch 3 where visitors "reveled in its absurdist celebrity." It would be remiss to not include 1 unexpected, and slightly hilarious result of the controversial public artwork: the boom in sales of real buttplugs in Paris. In fact a Parisian sexual practice store owner reported that while he usually sold 50 per month, in Nov 2014 (the calendar month after McCarthy's artwork went public) he sold over i,000.

Anish Kapoor: Dirty Corner

Anish Kapoor, Dirty Corner, 2015 - controversial public art
Anish Kapoor, Dirty Corner, mixed media, 60m x 8m, Versailles, 2015.
Image: © Anish Kapoor.

Most famous for Cloud Gate (also known as "The Bean") in Chicago's Millenium Park, superstar artist Anish Kapoor is no stranger to controversy after securing the sole rights to utilize Vantablack, a paint that was one time considered "the blackest black". In 2011 Kapoor exhibited his work Dirty Corner, a hulking steel structure 60 meters long and 8 meters high that visitors enter and progressively lose their perception of space every bit they move further in due to the darkness inside the slice. In 2015 Dirty Corner made its way to the Palace of Versailles where critics were turned off by what they reported as the 'blatantly sexual' nature of the work, that Kapoor himself described as "the vagina of a queen who is taking ability." The enraged critics vandalised Kapoor's piece of work with anti-Semitic slogans (Kapoor'south female parent is Jewish), which the artist decided to leave to stand up as an artefact of shame, and every bit a attestation to the horror and intolerance of humanity. However, French officials ordered Kapoor to remove the graffiti, which he decided to practice and then by covering it in gilt leaf, explaining information technology as "a royal response" to the vandalism and the sentiments it portrayed.

Dirty Corner Vandalised with Anti-Semitic Sentiments
Dirty Corner Vandalised with Anti-Semitic Sentiments
Anish Kapoor, Dirty Corner, mixed media, 60m x 8m, Versailles, 2015.

Ai Weiwei: Skillful Fences Brand Good Neighbors

Ai Weiwei, Arch, 2017
Ai Weiwei, Curvation, 2017 Galvanized steel and mirror polished stainless steel, 2017. Photo: Jason Wyche, Public Art Fund NY.

When the dissident Chinese artist Ai Weiwei was chosen past New York Metropolis's Public Art Fund to create a citywide large-scale exhibition in 2017, everyone sensed information technology would be political in nature. Weiwei'south Good Fences Make Adept Neighbors was in direct response to the anti-immigrant sentiments at play in America at the time, urging visitors to rethink preconceptions most the exclusionary nature of government policy. However overtly political the piece was, surprisingly its message garnered very trivial controversy, and the installation only became controversial public art when the time of year and location of exhibition was considered. A large-scale installation underneath the Washington Square Park triumphal curvation had displaced the annual Christmas tree's place of honour — angering those who felt that their holiday plans had been unnecessarily disrupted. The criticisms were met with a dismissive air from the Public Art Fund, an organisation that typically places great importance on working with local communities to ensure that the works receive positive reception, with President Susan K. Freedman admitting, "people upset about displacing a Christmas tree, that's not something I'thousand sympathetic to."

Ai Weiwei, Harlem Shelter 4, 2017: Controversial Public Art
Ai Weiwei, Harlem Shelter 4, Galvanized balmy steel, 2017. Photograph: Jason Wyche, Public Art Fund NY.

Relevant sources to larn more

Check out Curbed's Best Public Art in New York Metropolis
Acquire more than about controversial art with ten Controversial Artworks That Changed Fine art History or Controversial Fine art… Does It Get To You?

hansonmagere.blogspot.com

Source: https://magazine.artland.com/controversial-public-art-debate-fury-vandalism-and-loss/